Homework2-kheiting

=**TerpNav Critique **=

The traditional right click interface for start and end locations has a textual alternative through start and end location text boxes. Individuals unable to locate a building on the map may do so through textual search for buildings. These searches can be performed by building name, code, or number which allow for minimal keystrokes for the physically impaired. This is partially complete since textual representation of route/directions is not implemented. This is not complete.
 * Text Alternatives: **

**Time-Based:** Not applicable since no video or multimedia involved.

This is not available since textual representations of buildings is not available. The map is extremely illegible even at maximum zoom-in. Individuals with visual impairment have no audio or textual adaptive options. This is not complete.
 * Adaptability: **

The pathways on the map are difficult to see for visually impaired individuals even at maximum zoom-in. The map pathways are then made even more difficult to identify as sidewalks or dirt paths when the start and end locations are chosen and a red highlight is made between the points. The visually impaired could have difficulty distinguishing the highlighted path from the varying colors of roads and buildings. This is because crisp fine lines are not apparent and the size is so small. This is not complete.
 * Distinguishable: **

The entry for start and end locations is accessible and the route can be found through the keyboard. However the other tabs for map layers, and search are unable without the use of a mouse click. Also, the options for geo-coordinates and obtaining driving directions or obtaining the url for the map image is unavailable without a map right-click. This is partially complete.
 * Keyboard Accessible **:

Yes there is enough or is not applicable since no time limited sequences or multimedia is used. This is complete.
 * Enough Time:**

There is no multimedia or quickly refreshing map rates. The map zoom-in/out functions and move map left/right/up/down are all done smoothly but with a slow refresh rate. This is complete.
 * Seizures **:

The page title, tabs titles, and all other functions are labeled so that there function is obvious to the user. The pathways for obtaining the functions are all only one click away on the tabs menu or one right click away on the map. This is complete.
 * Navigable:**

**Readable: ** The content is only available in English which could be a problem for foreign students that do not excel at reading English. Otherwise the content is labeled throughout in unambiguous terms. This is partially complete.

**Predictable: ** Everything functions as expected and all functions and buttons are unambiguously.

**Input assistance: ** <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">There is the ability to use a building's name, code or number to identify a building in the search and routing finding functions. There is also assistance in correcting spelling for a building name. The search function will also allow partial entry of a building name to search. This is helpful to ensure correct identification even with incorrect spelling or lack of knowledge about a building

4.1.1 is satisfied since it is implemented in html and javascript and it is parsable. 4.1.2 is satisfied since the programmatic functions in the tabs is operated with javascript which allows for mark of name, role and value.
 * <span style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif;">Compatible **: